6.1 AssemblyresolutionA.950(23)dealswiththeestablishmentanddutiesoftheMaritime AssistanceService(MAS)ñthepointofcontactbetweenshipsandthecoastalStateforincidents whichdonotamounttodistress,anddistinguishesbetweentheMASandRescueCo-ordination Centres (RCC) in this regard.
6.2 WhiletheMASdoesnothavearescuefunction,anddoesnotnecessarilysupplysupport services itself, close contact with it should be established by the SAR Co-ordinator and maintainedbytheRCCinordertoaidcommunicationandco-ordination. Asrecommendedin resolutionA.950(23)*,considerationshouldbegiventohavingtheMASfunctioncarriedoutby theRCC. TheRCCwillthenhavedirectknowledgeof,andcontactwith,theservicesthatmay beavailabletosupportSAR,includingexternalsupportservices. Anadditionalbenefittothis arrangementisthatthereisthenasinglepointofcontactforthecoastalStateforashipwithan emergency to report.
6.3 In any event, it is important that, in incidents involving other responses in addition to SAR,theprioritiesarecleartoallinvolved. Thesafetyoflifetakespriorityoverprotectionof theenvironmentandthesalvingofproperty. Operationsshouldbecarefullyco-ordinatedsoas
toensurethatthisisthecase. Thisincludestheuseofsupportserviceswhoserolesmayinclude responsibilities in more than one area of operations.
______________________
* “TheallocationofMASfunctionstoanMRCCcouldfromapracticalviewpointbeanadvantageousand
effective solution but would require the personnel to be well trained in distinguishing between circumstances causing a ship to find itself in a distress situation and circumstances placing a ship in a difficultsituationbutnotindistressasdefinedintheSARConventionandproceduresarisingtherefrom” (resolution A.950(23), Annex 2, paragraph 1.2).