ItoRO no. 15 - Reporting and procedure for non-compliance

No. 15 - Reporting and procedure for non-compliance

1.		Introduction Chapter 5 of the Agreement arranges specific requirements on interpretations, equivalents and  exemptions. As final approval of equivalent arrangements, exemptions (or temporary non-compliance) is the prerogative of the Administration, there was a need to further specify the details on these issues in case of existing ships, flagging in and new building. Furthermore,  article 4.4 of the agreement regulates procedures if an existing ship is found to be substantially not in accordance with the particulars of its certificates or to be such that the ship is not fit for navigation without danger to the ship, those on board, those ashore, to other ships, or to the marine environment. The RO surveyor concerned shall immediately make sure that the necessary measures are taken to rectify the defects before departure. If such rectifying measures are not taken, RO shall, after consultation with the Administration, withdraw the certificate involved on behalf of the Administration. If temporarily, the requirements of an applicable instrument cannot be met under particular circumstances, RO shall consult the Administration prior to specifying such measures or supplementary equipment as may be available to permit the ship to proceed to a suitable port where permanent repairs or rectification can be effected or replacement equipment fitted. This Instruction to the Recognised Organisation provides a detailed procedure and conditions on the approval and issuance of exemptions or short-term certificates and equivalents, the requirements for reporting on this matter and describes the interpretation on the wording “substantially not in accordance with”.
2.		Items to be considered substantially not in accordance with its certificates In Annex I the Netherlands Shipping Inspectorate (NSI) stipulates an illustrative list (non-exhaustive1) of items to be considered as substantially not in accordance with its certificates. This list indicates items to be reported to NSI and dealt with before the ship is allowed to proceed to sea.
3.		Dealing with deviations The way the deviation of its statutory requirements is dealt with has two possible solutions and is described in paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2. In both cases the procedure as indicated in paragraph 4 of this document shall be followed.
	3.1.	Deviation where the issuance of an exemptions is mandatory Several International Conventions require mandatory issuance of exemption certificates for certain provisions.
		SOLAS 1974 IMO Circular SLS.14/Circ.115, as amended, (Annex II) provides a list of the provisions of the 1974 SOLAS Convention, as amended thereto, where an exemption certificate should be issued if the Administration grants an exemption.
		MARPOL 73/78 MARPOL, Annex I – Regulation 3 Impractibility due to constructional features MARPOL, Annex II – Regulation 4.3 Relaxation due to certain cargoes or trade MARPOL, Annex II– Regulation 4.4.5  Relaxation ballasting and tank washing
		Load Line 1966 Load Line, Article 6(3.1) Voyage between near neighbouring ports Load Line, Article 6(3.2)  Features of a novel kind
		HSC Code HSC Code, Paragraph 14.3.3 Exemptions individual craft
		COLREG 1972 Colreg, Rule 38  Lights and sound signal appliances
		For all abovementioned provisions an exemption certificate shall be issued and it is not possible to issue a short-term certificate
	3.2.	Equivalents (as mentioned in the regulatory framework) If an equivalent arrangement is requested or foreseen, NSI will (according to the information and the procedure under paragraph 4) review the founded proposal preferably in a format specified by the IMO. If approved, NSI will, according to the procedure as mentioned in SOLAS, Chapter I – regulation 5 (or other relevant instrument), submit the equivalent arrangement via its policy department to the IMO/EU. The IMO/EU will then circulate such particulars to the other Contracting Governments as a circular. The equivalent arrangement should be recorded in the related certificate and a copy of the arrangement should be attached to the certificate (in case the equivalent arrangement concerns an SLS circular, it suffices to reference the Circular in the certificate, although a copy may be attached).
	3.3.	Other deviations ISM/ISPS According to article 4.5 of the Agreement, a major non-conformity (ISM) or a major non-conformity/major failure as referenced in IACS PR24 (ISPS) should be reported to NSI immediately. NSI will determine, on a case-by-case basis, the procedures to be followed. Other Statutory items Deviations from statutory instruments, other then ISM/ISPS or mentioned under 3.1, may be documented by an exemption, short-term certificate, conditional certificate or by an outstanding recommendation/condition/statutory deficiency issued (up to the Recognised Organisation). In case of an exemption from national requirements where a separate exemption certificate is not required, the exemption may be incorporated in the related certificate cross-referencing the related article. Class items As indicated in article 2.6 of Annex II to the Agreement, the RO shall inform the Administration without delay if a ship has been declassed, class suspended or withdrawn and in case of suspension of the relevant class notation (including changes to class notations that have an effect on statutory items, e.g. change of unmanned machinery space notation).
4.		Procedure to be followed If the ship does not comply with the Netherlands’ applicable rules and regulations, the RO shall:
		A) For conditions found substantially not in accordance with its certificates or other need for an exemption, equivalent arrangement or similar course of action: Require the ship owner (or ship yard with new building) to submit a well-founded proposal to the RO for consideration; Process the request and make any necessary plan approvals etc. before forwarding its well founded recommendation including all relevant documentation calculations etc. and suggested conditions to the Administration; Submit the well-founded proposal accepted (including any recommendation for issuance of an exemption, equivalent arrangement, short term certificate etc.) by the RO for approval to NSI via the Netherlands branch office of the RO making use of the form2  contained in Annex III(3 ); and Act on NSI’s instruction.
		For reporting the class items, mentioned under 3.2, the form contained in Annex III should also be used.
		B) For deviations found substantially in accordance with its certificates: 1. Verify that the minor deficiency (such deviations do not need to be reported to NSI) is corrected within a suitable time period specified by the RO.

 

---

¹  List is based on IMO Resolution A.787(19), as amended by A.882(21). The list is illustrative and for a complete overview reference is made to the latest amendments and related international instruments.
²   if the RO has a standard form for reporting deviations already in place, that form may be used for reporting under the condition that it includes the minimum information as requested in the form in Annex III.
³   issue an exemption or short-term certificate without prior consultation of the Netherlands Shipping Inspectorate in those cases where the deviation is found outside of NSI’s office hours, but inform the Netherlands Shipping Inspectorate of the action taken providing the information contained in Annex III.

Annex I List of items to be considered as substantially not in accordance with its certificates

Some items deleted, while not part of the HSSC

 

3.1		General The lack of valid certificates and documents as required by the relevant instruments.
3.2		Areas under SOLAS  Failure of the proper operation of propulsion and other essential machinery, as well as electrical installations.   Insufficient cleanliness of engine room, excessive amount of oily-water mixtures in bilges, insulation of piping, including exhaust pipes in engine room contaminated by oil, improper operation of bilge pumping arrangements.   Failure of the proper operation of emergency generator, lighting, batteries and switches.   Failure of the proper operation of the main and auxiliary steering gear.   Absence, insufficient capacity or serious deterioration of personal life-saving appliances, survival craft and launching arrangements.   Absence, non-compliance or substantial deterioration of fire detection system, fire alarms, firefighting equipment, fixed fire-extinguishing installation, ventilation valves, fire dampers, quick-closing devices to the extent that they cannot comply with their intended use.   Absence, substantial deterioration or failure of proper operation of the cargo deck area fire protection on tankers.   Absence, non-compliance or serious deterioration of lights, shapes or sound signals.   Absence or failure of the proper operation of the radio equipment for distress and safety communication.   Absence or failure of the proper operation of navigation equipment, taking the provisions of SOLAS 74, Regulation V/16.2 into account.   Absence of corrected navigational charts, and/or all other relevant nautical publications necessary for the intended voyage, taking into account that a type approved electronic chart display and information system (ECDIS) operating on official data may be used as a substitute for the charts.   Absence of non-sparking exhaust ventilation for cargo pump rooms.   Serious deficiency in the operational requirements.   Number, composition or certification of crew not corresponding with the safe manning document (reference is made to Instruction to RO no.11 – Manning).
3.3		Areas under the IBC Code Missing or damaged high-pressure safety devices.   Electrical installations not intrinsically safe or not corresponding to code requirements.   Sources of ignition in hazardous locations.   Contraventions of special requirements in Chapter 15 of the Code.   Exceeding of maximum allowable cargo quantity per tank.   Insufficient heat protection for sensitive products.
3.4		Areas under the IGC Code Missing closing devices for accommodation or service spaces.   Bulkhead not gastight.   Defective air locks.   Missing or defective quick-closing valves.   Missing or defective safety valves.   Electrical installations not intrinsically safe or not corresponding to code requirements.   Ventilators in cargo area not operable.   Pressure alarms for cargo tanks not operable.   Gas detection plant and/or toxic gas detection plant defective.
3.5		Areas under Load Line Convention Significant areas of damage or corrosion, or pitting of plating and associated stiffening in decks and hull affecting strength to take local loads, unless proper temporary repairs for a voyage to a port for permanent repairs have been carried out.   The absence of an approved trim and stability booklet and, where applicable, an approved loading manual.   Absence, substantial deterioration or defective closing devices, hatch closing arrangements and watertight doors.   Absence of draft mark or draft mark impossible to read.
3.6		Areas under MARPOL 73/78, Annex I Absence, serious deterioration or failure of proper operation of the oily-water filtering equipment, the oil discharge monitoring and control system or the 15 ppm alarm arrangements.   Remaining capacity of slop and/or sludge tank insufficient for the intended voyage.   Oil Record Book not available.   Unauthorised discharge bypass fitted.   CAS Final Survey report file missing or not in conformity with Regulation 20.6 of MARPOL 73/78.
3.7		Areas under MARPOL 73/78, Annex II Absence of the P&A Manual.   No cargo record book available.   Unauthorised discharge bypass fitted.
3.8		Areas under MARPOL 73/78, Annex IV A sewage treatment plant is not of an approved type in accordance with the standards and test methods developed by an Organization.   Systems fitted to comminute and disinfect sewage is not of an approved type.   A pipeline for the discharge of sewage to a reception facility, fitted with a standard shore connection is not fitted.
3.9		Areas under MARPOL 73/78, Annex VI Absence of Approved Technical File.   Absence of Record Book of Engine Parameters.   (Modifications to) Applicable engines not shown in the Approved Technical File.   Applicable engine components have not been replaced with approved spare parts.   Lack of or invalid records of the changeover to and from low sulphur fuel during transit through a  SOx Emission Control Areas.   Absence of instruction manual for the operation of the incinerator, where applicable.   Lack of bunker delivery notes, or relevant documentation in the event the supplier did not provide a bunker delivery note.   An incinerator installed on board the ship on or after 1 January 2000 does not comply with requirements contained in appendix IV to the Annex, or the standard specifications for shipboard incinerators developed by the Organization (resolutions MEPC.76(40) and MEPC.93(45)).   the master or crew are not familiar with essential procedures
3.10		Areas which may not warrant a detention, but where, e.g. cargo operations have to be suspended. Failure of the proper operation (or maintenance) of inert gas system, cargo-related gear or machinery are considered sufficient grounds for stopping cargo operation.

 

Annex II SLS.14/Circ.115, as amended

Annex III Report concerning non compliance

• Informatietype: Informatie voor uitvoering
• Documentsoort: Werkinstructie
• Toegangsrechten: Extern
• Identificatie: PUC_1195_14
• Versie: 2
• Datum beschikbaarheid: 06-03-2013
• Geldigheid van: 05-03-2013
• tot en met: 27-03-2014
• Wijzigingsdatum: 22-12-2016
• Titel: ItoRO no. 15 - Reporting and procedure for non-compliance
• Organisatie: Inspectie Leefomgeving en Transport
• Taal: Engels
• Onderwerp: Erkende organisaties / Recognised Organisations; Veiligheid / Safety; Milieu / Environment; Security; Arbeidsomstandigheden / Labour conditions
• Hoofdtaak: Koopvaardij / Merchant Shipping
• Thema: Zeevaart / Seagoing ships / Instructions to ROs / National Instruments (Instructions) / National Instructions