Ingangsdatum:
01-01-1996
Geldig tot en
met: 23-03-2006
THE COUNCIL
OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing he European
Community, and in particular Article 84 (2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),
Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and
Social Committee (2),
Acting in accordance with the
procedure referred to in Article 189c of the Treaty (3),
Whereas the Community is seriously concerned by
shipping casualties with loss of life;
Whereas the
International Safety Management Code providing for the safe operation of
ships and for pollution prevention, hereinafter referred to as the 'ISM
Code', was adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) through
Assembly Resolution A.741(18) of 4 November 1993 in the presence of the
Member States and, through its incorporation into the International
Convention on the Safety of Life at Sea 1974, will apply to ro-ro passenger
vessels from 1 July 1998;
Whereas this represents one
of a series of measures to improve safety at sea; whereas the ISM Code is
not yet of a mandatory but of a recommendatory nature;
Whereas safety of human life at sea may be effectively
enhanced by applying the ISM Code strictly and on a mandatory basis;
Whereas the Community's most urgent concern is for the
safety management of ro-ro passenger ferries; whereas a uniform and coherent
implementation of the ISM Code in all Member States can constitute a step
towards the safety management of ro-ro passenger ferries;
Whereas in its resolution of 22 December 1994 on the
safety of roll-on/roll-off passenger ferries (4), the Council invited the
Commission to submit a proposal on the advance mandatory application of the
ISM Code to all regular roll-on/roll-off passenger ferry services operating
to or from European ports, in compliance with international law;
Whereas strict and mandatory application of the ISM
Code is required to ensure the establishment and proper maintenance of
safety management systems by companies operating seagoing ro-ro passenger
ferries both at ship and at company level;
Whereas
action at Community level is the best way to ensure advance mandatory
enforcement of the provisions of the ISM Code and effective control of its
application, while avoiding distortion of competition between different
Community ports and ro-ro ferries; whereas only a regulation, which is of
direct applicability, can ensure such enforcement; whereas advance
implementation requires that the Regulation be applicable as from 1 July
1996;
Whereas the advance mandatory implementation of
the ISM Code to all ro-ro ferries regardless of their flag also takes into
account the request contained in point 2 of IMO Resolution A.741(18) which
strongly urges Governments to implement the Code as soon as possible, giving
priority inter alia to passenger ships;
Whereas the
safety of ships is the primary responsibility of flag States; whereas Member
States can ensure compliance with adequate safety management rules by
ferries flying their flag and companies operating them; whereas the only way
to ensure the safety of all ro-ro ferries, irrespective of their flag,
operating or wishing to operate on a regular service from their ports is for
the Member States to require effective compliance with safety rules as a
condition for operating on a regular service from their ports;
Whereas companies operating ro-ro ferries exclusively
in sheltered waters between ports in the same Member State constitute a more
limited risk and will need to assume a proportionately greater
administrative work-load than other companies, and should therefore enjoy a
temporary derogation;
Whereas it is necessary to
identify the requirements under which the provisions of the ISM Code are
enforced and to define the conditions for the issue and verification of the
document of compliance and of the safety management certificate;
Whereas Member States might find it necessary to
delegate or rely upon specialized bodies in order to fulfil their
obligations pursuant to this Regulation; whereas the appropriate way of
ensuring a uniform and adequate level of control is to require that such
bodies should only be those which meet the requirements of Council Directive
94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship
inspection and survey organizations and for the relevant activities of
maritime administrations (1);
Whereas a Member State
must have the possibility of suspending the operation of certain ro-ro
ferries from its ports where it considers that there is a risk of serious
danger to safety of life or property or the environment, subject to a
decision to be taken in the framework of a regulatory committee, to which
the Member States must conform;
Whereas a simplified
procedure involving a committee of a regulatory nature is necessary to amend
this Regulation taking into account developments at international level;
Whereas the rapid introduction of these safety rules
raises specific technical and administative problems for Greece because of
the very large number of companies established in Greece operating ferries
under the Greek flag and exclusively between Greek ports; whereas a
derogation of limited duration to cover this situation should therefore be
granted bearing in mind in addition that regular passenger and ferry
services between Greek ports have been excluded until 1 January 2004 from
the freedom to provide services granted by Council Regulation (EEC) No
3577/92 of 7 December 1992 applying the principle of freedom to provide
services to maritime transport within Member States (maritime cabotage) (2),
(1) OJ No C 298, 11. 11. 1995, p. 23, and
amended proposal submitted on 15 June 1995 (OJ No C 288, 11. 11. 1995,
p. 31).
(2) OJ No C 236, 11. 9. 1995, p. 42.
(3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 14 June
1995 (OJ No C 166, 3. 7. 1995, p. 55), Council common position of 28
September 1995 (OJ No C 297, 10. 11. 1995, p. 1) and decision of the
European Parliament of 29 November 1995 (not yet published in the
Official Journal).
(4) OJ No C 379, 31. 12. 1994,
p. 8.
(1) OJ No L 319, 12. 12. 1994, p. 20.
(2) OJ No L 364, 12. 12. 1992, p.
7.